OK...my first try and my message got wiped out. Alistair, I hope all is well. My best guess is that the intent will be to NOT compensate any physician using an hospital supplied EHR while working for the hospital in any capacity in any venue. Anesthesiologists/ED physcians/and pathologists are just examples... For those who haven't read the actual document, here goes: "No incentive payment may be made under this paragraph in the case of a hospital-based eligible professional...the term 'hospital-based eligible professional' means, with respect to covered professional services furnished by an eligible professional during the EHR reporting period for a payment year, an eligible professional, such as a pathologist, anesthesiologist, or emergency physician, who furnishes substantially all of such services in a hospital setting (whether inpatient or outpatient) and through the use of the facilities and equipment, including qualitified electronic health records, of the hospital." Here's what I don't know: 1) What happens to the physician who has received funds from a hosptial to purchase an EMR in a private office? I suspect they'll receive the full incentive payment. If so, I doubt any hospital will assist physicians with the first $44,000 cost of a system. Plus, the price point of an office EMR will drop below the 44k threshold in any event...who'd pay more? 2) What about a Foundation model, so prevalent in California? I suppose it will depend upon how the Foundation documents are drawn up and who actually owns the EMR asset. Ben |